I Write the Songs that Make the Whole Web Sing
By Ian Alexander / September 18, 2009
Learn the all the notes. Sing all the songs
Whistle While You Work
Business goals, gap analysis and taxonomy definitions are useful tools for determining what should be said where. And the different tactical delivery methods: (video, how-to article, mobile, info-graphics, social media) dramatically affect the presentation and context of the content, helping us determine the how. Combined with budgets, calendars, SEO, style guides and a host of other details, Content Strategy attempts to responsibly create quality content and put it where it is most appropriate, in the most viable format. What song we whistle while we are doing it is inconsequential, as long as it is in tune with rest of the symphony.
Content Strategy Mimids
Most everyone can recognize the song of the Blue jay, Seagull or (fill in your regional bird). Each bird’s song is distinctive and helps them mate, protect, and communicate. But Mimids, the family of birds that includes mockingbirds, are one of the few birds that can mimic the sounds of other animals, including other birds. This is their most powerful tool and the foundation of how they survive.
Content Strategy, a broadly under-defined term, fits rather well into the family of Mimidae (Mimids). Our tools and roles are centered on our ability to mimic, understand and interconnect many different practices. Sometimes due to our ability to whistle different tunes, we are viewed as extra, unnecessary or covered under the punch list of another practice. When this is true it is usually due to poor project management or unsatisfactory vendor assessment/selection.
Great content strategists are like that friend you have who is just as comfortable (and charming) discussing Renaissance art at an Upper West Side gathering as they are graffiti in a Brooklyn rail yard. They are the kind of people who, years after knowing them, you realize they speak Swahili and went to Rice on a basketball scholarship. They are multi-faced, fascinated and fascinating. They are happily many sides of many coins and their ability to sing the appropriate song at the appropriate time, without sticking to a style, or favorite key, is what makes them valuable.
In the Content Strategy (CS) world there are four basic families:
The Mimid Families
Content Strategy Technologists—are perfect for projects that are CMS heavy (assessments, migrations, template setups), or require medium-to-heavy code/data base lifting or understanding in order to bring a project to fruition. The technologists are usually technical project managers or coders who understand that technology that just pushes numbers around is called a calculator. And calculators aren’t all that engaging to read on a Sunday.
Content Strategy Editorialists—are perfect for projects that require managing and organizing content at the nuts and bolts level (content inventory, style guide creation, editorial calendaring and curation.) These folks are writers at heart but stole away from the Underwood years ago and realized that content needs technology. *See bankrupt magazines and newspapers.
Content Strategy UX/IA’ers—are perfect for projects that require managing and organizing content at both the macro and micro level (gap analysis, wire-frames, content identification). Content Strategists with IA/UX leanings are a powerful blend of logic, information architecture understanding and have a particularly valuable focus on the space where content meets and becomes information. Go Team OmniGraffle!
Content Strategy Designers—are perfect for projects that require managing and organizing content when design is a key element of how and why the information is being presented to the user. There are some designers who simply copy the text the copywriter gave them from WordPad to Photoshop and make it pretty. There are others who ask questions like “why are we saying this on this screen.” Wireframes, information architecture and even some front-end coding are tools in their belt. These people usually have great haircuts.
Detailing these four types of Content Strategists is not meant as a selective quadfurcation but more as a glossary of the broad skill-set under the Content Strategy umbrella. And while each of the above may have leanings towards one strength, be it Design, UX/IA, Editorial or Technology, the practice itself hinges on the practitioner’s ability to understand all the notes and know when to sing which song, when to listen and when to hit shuffle.
—Ian

September 20th, 2009 at 1:22 pm
Well said Ian! I agree that it’s important for CS’s to be able to function in all these modes, and at the same time it’s really helpful to understand where your own strengths are. Then we can build up our skills in the other areas, or call in backup when we need to. But understanding the full range of how people apply CS will (hopefully) prevent people from being myopic, and defining CS too narrowly as the corner where their particular expertise lies.
September 20th, 2009 at 5:03 pm
Paramount article, Ian, and I love the ornithological slant. I think these four delineations are very timely; a lot of people around the world (already) have come to hear about this CS thing and are now looking for more insight to how their schema maps to it.
Having wore a lot of hats across the technology, UX/IA and design realms, I recognize a lot of overlap across these four areas, which makes me feel pretty good about my grasp of CS so far, holistically speaking.
I do witness conversations among newcomers, however, where people talk confidently about content strategy but lack background in two or more of these four realms, as evident by their dialog. This seems especially true from the technologists camp, and thus why I think this is a timely article.
Clearly there’s a lot of exciting work to do yet; teaching, learning, defining, establishing, acknowledging, rewarding…
September 20th, 2009 at 7:20 pm
Good article to try and delineate some of the stratas of CSes. These also change with levels of experience. An editorial CS may become a design CS, or develop their technological acumen and do a switch somewhere along the line. Interesting stuff – like your take on it.
September 20th, 2009 at 8:46 pm
Well put, Ian. It’s exciting to see this sort of evolution within content strategy, and I expect we’ll continuing discovering and describing nuanced facets as the discipline matures. ~Seven years ago, I think many of us were of the “editorialist” variety you describe, but I’m proud that we’re becoming a “bit tent” discipline that embraces our more tech-oriented brethren along with those rare but fabulous content strategy-savvy designers.
I wonder if by focusing on the breadth of our work we’ll avoid the strangling quicksand of the “define the damn thing” discussion that mires other disciplines in our industry?
September 30th, 2009 at 9:35 am
[...] Strategy Mimid Families 2009 September 30 by brohanyc Excerpted from Eat Media blog post ‘I Write the Songs that Make the Whole Web Sing’ from September 9, [...]
December 2nd, 2009 at 2:27 pm
[...] I Write the Songs that Make the Whole Web Sing, by Ian Alexander [...]
March 4th, 2010 at 7:42 am
Thanks for sharing such an topical article with all of us. I’ve bookmarked your blog will come back for a re-read again. Keep up the excellent work. We have a Dan Kennedy Copywriting seminar that we offer to our customers you can check it out here Copywriting Course Visit This
March 27th, 2010 at 5:36 pm
Social comments and analytics for this post…
This post was mentioned on Twitter by jeffmacintyre: An instant classic for the #contentstrategy canon. A taxonomy of CSes as birds of a feather. RT @eatmedia: http://bit.ly/G6ZTH #ux…
April 2nd, 2010 at 12:02 pm
[...] » The Holistic Specialist Part II: Content Strategists Are Superheroes. See also this Eat Media post by Ian [...]