<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kodachrome: Another Digital Obituary for Photography</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eatmedia.net/blog/2009/06/kodachrome-another-digital-obituary-for-photography/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eatmedia.net/blog/2009/06/kodachrome-another-digital-obituary-for-photography/</link>
	<description>For the Content Hungry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 19:53:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Digital Camera Sports Photography</title>
		<link>http://eatmedia.net/blog/2009/06/kodachrome-another-digital-obituary-for-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-2842</link>
		<dc:creator>Digital Camera Sports Photography</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 20:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eatmedia.net/blog/?p=247#comment-2842</guid>
		<description>Wow...super article. I’ve examine a few other articles inside your weblog and discovered very educational and I understand many point as well from the meaningful posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow&#8230;super article. I’ve examine a few other articles inside your weblog and discovered very educational and I understand many point as well from the meaningful posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digital Photography Class</title>
		<link>http://eatmedia.net/blog/2009/06/kodachrome-another-digital-obituary-for-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-2664</link>
		<dc:creator>Digital Photography Class</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 21:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eatmedia.net/blog/?p=247#comment-2664</guid>
		<description>I love taking photos. I need to spend more money and get a decent camera though. Anyways, nice and informative content and your blog in general looks very cool. Keep up the good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love taking photos. I need to spend more money and get a decent camera though. Anyways, nice and informative content and your blog in general looks very cool. Keep up the good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Photographic Studio Equipment</title>
		<link>http://eatmedia.net/blog/2009/06/kodachrome-another-digital-obituary-for-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-2658</link>
		<dc:creator>Photographic Studio Equipment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 15:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eatmedia.net/blog/?p=247#comment-2658</guid>
		<description>Very useful info. These is exactly what I was looking for and it`s what I need if I am to become more than an amateur photographer. Thanx and keep up the good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very useful info. These is exactly what I was looking for and it`s what I need if I am to become more than an amateur photographer. Thanx and keep up the good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Professional Photography Equipment</title>
		<link>http://eatmedia.net/blog/2009/06/kodachrome-another-digital-obituary-for-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-2657</link>
		<dc:creator>Professional Photography Equipment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 13:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eatmedia.net/blog/?p=247#comment-2657</guid>
		<description>You have a very interesting blog here. I`ve already bookmark it and I hope you constantly update it with fresh content. Thank you and keep up the good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have a very interesting blog here. I`ve already bookmark it and I hope you constantly update it with fresh content. Thank you and keep up the good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rv water filter</title>
		<link>http://eatmedia.net/blog/2009/06/kodachrome-another-digital-obituary-for-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-2632</link>
		<dc:creator>rv water filter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 04:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eatmedia.net/blog/?p=247#comment-2632</guid>
		<description>A bit of fragrance always clings to the hand that gives you roses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A bit of fragrance always clings to the hand that gives you roses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Verity</title>
		<link>http://eatmedia.net/blog/2009/06/kodachrome-another-digital-obituary-for-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-1884</link>
		<dc:creator>John Verity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 22:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eatmedia.net/blog/?p=247#comment-1884</guid>
		<description>I am with you all the way on this, man, totally. Been shooting Kodachrome - and much more, B&amp;W - since the late 1960s and I have many boxes of &#039;chromes from the 40s and 50s (my father was an avid shooter, too) that look like they were shot yesterday. (Well, almost. K&#039;chrome had a slightly different pallette in those days. But it&#039;s certainly the hardiest of color of films, resisting change as long as it&#039;s kept cool, dark, and dry.) I still have (in the freezer) a handful of unshot rolls, and some mailers, and the address of Dwayne&#039;s in Kansas which now processes this film - and will, through 2010, they say. 
  Those revelling in their spiffy new digital cams, with more computing power than a 1990 PC, will likely never know the alchemical joys of silver-based photography. Too much digital photography looks much too much the same - homogenized images that all seem to show the same range of colors, the same depth of field, the same boring, lifeless lighting. Like you say, it&#039;s all turning into TV - screens rule.

Yours in Leica, 
 JV</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am with you all the way on this, man, totally. Been shooting Kodachrome &#8211; and much more, B&amp;W &#8211; since the late 1960s and I have many boxes of &#8216;chromes from the 40s and 50s (my father was an avid shooter, too) that look like they were shot yesterday. (Well, almost. K&#8217;chrome had a slightly different pallette in those days. But it&#8217;s certainly the hardiest of color of films, resisting change as long as it&#8217;s kept cool, dark, and dry.) I still have (in the freezer) a handful of unshot rolls, and some mailers, and the address of Dwayne&#8217;s in Kansas which now processes this film &#8211; and will, through 2010, they say.<br />
  Those revelling in their spiffy new digital cams, with more computing power than a 1990 PC, will likely never know the alchemical joys of silver-based photography. Too much digital photography looks much too much the same &#8211; homogenized images that all seem to show the same range of colors, the same depth of field, the same boring, lifeless lighting. Like you say, it&#8217;s all turning into TV &#8211; screens rule.</p>
<p>Yours in Leica,<br />
 JV</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
